IJMRE International Journal of Management Research and Economics 2710-141X SvedbergOpen ijmre-1-2-004 10.51483/IJMRE.1.1.2021.33-37 Research Paper On Joan Robinson’s role in creating the myth that R. Kahn originated the multiplier concept BradyMichael Emmett 1 * 1Adjunct Lecturer, California State University, Dominguez Hills, College of Business Administration and Public Policy Department of Operations Management, 1000 East Victoria St., Carson, California 90747 USA. E-mail: mandmbrady@juno.com *Corresponding author: Michael Emmett Brady, Adjunct Lecturer, California State University, Dominguez Hills, College of Business Administration and Public Policy Department of Operations Management, 1000 East Victoria St., Carson, California 90747 USA. E-mail: mandmbrady@juno.com 04 2021 1 2 33 37 Abstract

An enduring myth accepted by all Orthodox and heterodox economists is that it was Richard Kahn who discovered and originated the concept of the multiplier. Kahn then supposedly showed Keynes how the multiplier concept could be specified mathematically so as to provide hard support for Keynes’s views in the late 1920s about increased initial government spending on public infrastructure generating much larger increases in total spending than the original injection, leading to decreasing levels of unemployment. There are three major problems with this story. First, Kahn, himself, in a 1936 response to Hans Neisser in the Review of Economics and Statistics stated that most of his ideas about the multiplier concept came from Keynes. Second, the mathematical and logical development of the multiplier concept had already been formalized and formulated precisely by Keynes in 1921 on p. 315 in footnote 1 of the A Treatise on Probability in section 8 of chapter 26. Third, Keynes provided an arithmetic example of the mathematical technique worked out in the A Treatise on Probability in May, 1929 (Kent, 2007). There is simply no foundation for the myth, promoted by Joan Robinson, that Kahn was the author of the multiplier concept. Kahn went along with Robinson because he was involved in a 54-year old relationship with Joan Robinson. Keynes taught Kahn the theory of the multiplier concept and left it up to Kahn to write a full blown article on it, which was then published by Keynes in the June,1931 issue of the Economic Journal.

 Keywords Multiplier Infinite series Finite limit Geometrical series Decreasing series Neisser A Treatise on Probability General theory References ArthmarR.BradyMichael Emmett. (2007). A 1929 Application of Multiplier Analysis by Keynes: a note. Unpublished; (November). Paper was rejected by the editor of History of Political Economy, Craufurd Goodwin, without review. BradyM.E. (1997). The Development of Keynes’s Theories of Risk in chapters 26 and 29 of the A Treatise on Probability, 26, 143–145. BradyMichael Emmett. (2004). A Note on the Mathematics of the Keynesian Expenditure Multiplier and Keynes’s Risk Model R of the A Treatise on Probability (1921). In BradyM.E., Essays on John Maynard Keynes and Xlibris Press; Philidelphia, Pennsylvania, 500–504. ChaingA. (1974). Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. (2nd edition). New York; McGraw Hill. FonsecaG.L.Richard F. Kahn, 1905-1989. History of Economic Thought. Institute for New Economic Thinking. KahnRichard. (1931). The Relation ofHome Investment to Unemployment. Economic Journal, 41, 173–98. KahnRichard (1936). Dr. Neisser on Secondary Employment: A Note. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 144–147. KahnRichard. (1984). The Making of Keynes’ General Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. KentR. (2007). A 1929 Application of Multiplier Analysis by Keynes. History of Political Economy, 39(3), 529–543. KeynesJ. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London, Macmillan. John Maynard Keynes, (1973c). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Vol. 7 of the CWJMK, ed. by D. Moggridge. London: Macmillan. KeynesJ.M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VIII. London: Macmillan, 1973. J. M. Keynes (1937). The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209–223. KeynesJ.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Harcourt, Brace and World: New York. John Maynard Keynes (1973). The General Theory and After, Part I: Preparation, (The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Volume XIII) Palgrave Macmillan: London. John Maynard Keynes (1973). The General Theory and After: Defence and Development, Vol. 14 Palgrave Macmillan. John Maynard Keynes (1979). The General Theory and After: A supplement, Vol. 29 (Collected works of Keynes) ed. by D. Moggridge. Palgrave Macmillan: London. NeisserHans. (1936). Secondary Employment: Some comments on R.F. Kahn’s Formula. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(1) pp. 24–30. NeisserHans. (1936). Dr. Neisser on Secondary Employment: A rejoinder. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(1), 147–148 RobertsonD. (1936). Some Notes On Mr. Keynes’ General Theory Of Employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(1), 168–191 . RobinsonJoan. (1972). What has become of the Keynesian Revolution? In Joan Robinson. ( ed.). After Keynes. 1973 Papers presented to Section F (Economics) at the 1972 Annual Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. SamuelsonP. (1963). D. H. Robertson (1890-1963). Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77(4), 517–536. SamuelsonP. (1977). St. petersburg paradoxes: Defanged, dissected, and historically described. Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 24–55. SchumpeterJ.A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis .Oxford University Press; England (2nd ed., 1996) ShackleG.L. S. (1951). Twenty Years on: A Survey of the theory of the Multiplier. Economic Journal, LXI, 241–260. TrevithickJ.A. (1994). The monetary prerequisites for the multiplier: an adumbration of the crowding-out hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 77–90.